Creator of horror Five Nights at Freddy’s Scott Couton (Scott Cawthon) announced that he no longer plans to professionally develop games. He reported the news shortly after a scandal erupted around his political preferences.
Recently on the network surfaced information on expenses Couton, From which it follows that he donated money to the Republicans of the United States, including the former president Donald Trump (Donald Trump). The progressive part of the Internet has accused the creator FNAF In homophobia, femininity (Republicans oppose abortion) and other mortal sins.
In the post on Reddit Couton He said that he began to send threats that scared his pregnant wife. Nevertheless, the developer is on his own – he has nothing to ask for forgiveness:
I am a Republican. I am a Christian. I am against abortion. I believe in God. I also believe in equality, both in science and in common sense. Whoever says, all these things can coexist. This is not an apology and not the promise to change – it has always been so.
If they cancel me, then they will cancel me. I don’t work anymore for the sake of money; I work because I enjoy it. If people think that now I am more harmful than good, then it may be better if they cancel me and I will rest. I will accept it. I had a rich career. In addition, most of the things that can take away from you are not so valuable.
A few days later Couton confirmed – yes, he leaves the industry. According to the developer, he misses the development of games for his children and to create RPG, although, they say, it turns out that he has badly. Couton leaves to devote more time for six children.
For FNAF This is not the end-the ex-developer intends to entrust the development of a series to the person to whom he trusts. Details about the transfer of the franchise to new hands will become known later.
The community reacted to the decision Couton With understanding – the hashtag #thankyouscott got into the Twitter trends.
June 17, 2021 the new DLC on Arma III will unfold on the border of Czechoslovakia during the Cold War
June 17, 2021 Call of Duty: Warzone was the first game on PS5 with support for 120 FPS in reverse compatibility
Five Nights at Freddy’s
The best comments
And I like that he did not apologize and bend under them. Said what he thinks and do what you want, well done man.
It seems to me that people are divided not only into atheists and religious fanatics.
What a wonderful time to be alive!
If you are against abortion, you are a wife? How does this work?
Firstly, the find for me is the fact that most of the audience FNAF – LGBT,* This is because there are animatronic animals, attracted Furri’s attention?
Well, it is obvious that Scott was stuck in FNAF and could no longer move away from the concept of these games, began to self-have, and most likely this served that he leaves with such a light soul.
If we assume that inspiration left him, and the loyal audience rebelled against him -a reasonable solution
* The activities of the International Public Movement of LGBT are recognized as extremist and is prohibited in the Russian Federation
Firstly, the find for me is the fact that most of the audience FNAF – LGBT,* This is because there are animatronic animals, attracted Furri’s attention?
Not at all. I give a hand that most who unsubscribed to him, especially on social networks, are not fanfa fans and even gamers. This is often mutating through the reposts of people who have nothing to do in life, and they track the goals on Twitter for pious jihad.
Now, and in the American segment of the “loud-speaking”, it is believed that everything that is connected with or inherent in the non-lane side of politics should be punishable by death, including the people themselves. They also poison ordinary users, of those few who still express a “non -standard” opinion. Calls, letters and threats to the family and the employer for them the norm. Just Scott a famous personality, so there is news.
The question is generally why in https://rtbetcasino.co.uk/ the network information about its expenses. If not by stupidity itself, then some creatures do not lazy to “check” for “correctness”.
* The activities of the International Public Movement of LGBT are recognized as extremist and is prohibited in the Russian Federation
Well, look according to their logic, if you do not give an abortion, then you do not let the woman manage her body herself, then you do not consider her for a person, then the feminine.
How one -sidedly and you just look at this question, lord.
And if the girl was raped? There she also had to protect? You can imagine how she will hate this child and what hell will turn their life? And why should she be responsible for the act of the person who raised her?
And if the 16 -year -old girl, by stupidity, flew? Drive her and the child all your life, forcing the child to raise another child, for "the fetus is already alive, abortion is a murder"? We will not allow her to drink alcohol and drive a car, because she is still a child, does not understand anything, but to educate children – this is please, then for her?
The fetus is no more than a set of cells. This is not a person. He does not have self -awareness, he never knew what it means to “live”, and in general, from a person there is only the beginnings of the internal structure and DNA. He becomes a person only at the time of birth. So there is no question of any "murder" here.
Well, yes, it is easy to rant about the “killing of fruits” when you do not know how an sometimes unplanned pregnancy breaks the life of a mother and child. For me, it is better to let the mother do 10 abortions than even one child will grow in an environment where his own mother hates him, due to the fact that he is a rape product.
Well, yes, the question is to give women to control their body themselves, I just understand that if you start to take it seriously, most people in this thread will go into denial and the dialogue will not work. Therefore, I will limit myself to the arguments given above.
Only now the Vypers of these idiots have a non -fingered influence on modern Western companies that are trying to please them in one way or another, and they really like to plug people who do not support them (we recall the same blocking of Trump’s accounts in almost all Western social. networks or the same modern Twich rules). And, well, do not forget that they can also put an end to a person’s further career with their statements and unreasonable accusations (for example, you can remember what happened to Alec Kholovka, after he was accused of harassment without the provision of any docabasry). Like yes, you can say anything, but no one gives you guarantees that after your words they will not try to “cancel” you.
And the yab preferred to send it to the self -drifted. Weak are not necessarily bad people, but self -drifted a good person is bad, but every guano who spreads up people from the perspective of the strength of Kazraz Nezhalvko.
Recently, information about Couton’s expenses surfaced on the network, from which it follows that he donated money to the US Republican
But if it turns out that all the revenue from the purchase of a stalker will be sent to Bandera
I hope that it is not necessary to explain that the Republican Party of the United States is not ultra -right supporters of dubious personalities of the first half of the 20th century. And that Couton even “actions” for which he did not “answer”. Typically, supporters of “misconduct answers” precisely advocated for lynching, crystal night in Germany and other radical things, which, apparently, are accused of Couton. Irony.
Well, since the embryo may have the right, then let them also give them to the ejaculate, otherwise there will be no equality.
The whole essence of left-wing-democrats, in whom only in words everyone is equal and have the right to their point of view.
Just do not say that a religious person in the original sense, a person will be able to get along with science.
I often heard the opinion that there are many scientists or just smart people believers. I decided to google in order to reinforce my words with something, and did not expect so much confirmation. I bring a small part of quotes.
Galileo Galileo (1564-1642):
“Nature, no doubt, is the second book of God, which we should not refuse, but which we must read”.
Isaac Newton (1643-1727):
“The wonderful structure of space and harmony in it can only be explained by the fact that the cosmos was created according to the plan of the omnipotent and omnipotent creature. Here is my first and last word ".
Mikhail Lomonosov (1711-1765)
“Truth and faith are two relatives, the daughters of one Almighty parent, never can come among themselves, unless of some vanity and testimony of their own philosophizing the enmity exclaimed on them”.
Thomas Edison (1847-1931)
“My greatest respect and admiration is to all engineers, especially the greatest of them – God!"
Max Planck (1858-1947)
“Wherever and no matter how far we look, we do not find the contradictions between religion and natural science, on the contrary, in the fundamental points the best combination. Religion and natural science do not exclude each other, as some people believe in our days or are afraid, these two areas complement each other and dependent on each other ".
Albert Einstein (1879-1955.)
“My religion consists in a feeling of modest admiration for the boundless mindfulness, showing ourselves in the smallest details of the picture of the world that we can only partially cover and know our mind. This deep emotional confidence in the highest logical harmony of the structure of the universe is my idea of God "
Alberta Einstein always sink in vain
His worldview to religions and their beliefs is barely related
The idea of God in many "believers" of scientists can be attributed to something in the spirit of spinosism
On the one hand, I am for abortion, since abortion kills children.
On the other hand, I am against, since abortion gives women the right to choose.
What is the absurdity, threaten a person for supporting, in their opinion, the wrong person. Just a brief description of Western freedom of speech in our time.
It seems like abortions are allowed up to 7-9 weeks of pregnancy, before the fetus begins to respond to external stimuli. It seems to me that this is quite honest with the fetus and to society and in general to everything))
It’s all right with your head? You think that people have the right to create any rubbish in the world? All actions have their consequences. Or for you in the world there is no morality, everything is against everyone, everything for everything?
Where I wrote that you can create any rubbish in the world? I can not attribute my invented arguments to me or can’t prove my case differently?
Look at the communities and the content of this franchise, there are sometimes done sometimes worse than that of poor Sonic.